Saturday 6 August 2016

(5) Brahma Raakshasa's questions


VI


TWO PRINCES AND THE BRAHMA RAAKSHASA


Once upon a time, a King by name Ratnaangada ruled the city of Amrita on the banks of the Vipaasha.  He had two sons Rukmaangada and Hemaangada - both wise and good and dearly loved by their father.
Rukmangada was well versed in all the Scriptures; but Hemaangada was a Knower of the highest order.
Once both the brothers went to the forests with a huge retinue to hunt wild animals. They spent a long time enjoying the sport of hunting. Later getting exhausted they rested near a spring.
Nearby lived a Brahma Rakshasa; a Brahminic devil. The devil was well versed in all the Scriptures and very learned. He used to challenge many a learned person who passed that way for a scholarly discussion and defeat them easily; in the end he ate them and satisfied his hunger.
Some travelers passing that way informed the princes of the danger lurking nearby and hurried off before the devil saw them. Rukmaangada felt amused about this learned ghoul and decided to confront it in a scholarly debate.
Both the brothers went in search of it, found the Brahmaraakshasa resting on a huge tree. Rukmaangada challenged the devil and engaged him in an argument. However his textual supremacy was not up to the devil’s wisdom and he was soon defeated in the debate.
The ghoul emitted a terrifying laughter and grabbed him tightly in its huge hands and got ready to consume him. 

Hemaangada who was watching all this immediately shouted:
“O Brahmaraakshasa, do not eat him yet! I am his younger brother. Defeat me also in argument so that you may eat us both together”.

The ghoul was not to be put out. He did not let go of Rukmaangada and replied:
“I have long been without food. Let me first finish this long-wished for prey, and then I shall defeat you in debate and complete my meal with you. I hope to make a hearty meal of you both.”

The younger Prince decided to engage the wise ghoul in conversation and said:
“O Brahmaraakshasa! You do not look like an ordinary being. You are very learned and wiser than even many a human scholar!
Why do you defeat people in scholarly disputes and eat them?
Please answer me before you eat my brother.”

The ghoul said:
“In the past I ate anyone who passed this way while crossing the jungle.
Once DevaVrata, a disciple of Sage Vasishta passed this way. When I pounced on him, he got angry and cursed me saying, ‘May your mouth be burnt if you indulge in human prey any more.’
I prayed to him with great humility and he condescended to modify his curse thus:
‘You may eat those who are defeated by you in debate.’
Since then I am in strict obedience of his words. I have waited all this time for a prey. This food which I have caught is very dear to me. Allow me to eat your brother who has been defeated by me. I shall deal with you after finishing this meal.”

Hemaangada again stopped him saying-
“Wait, Wait! Listen to my words! Please release my brother.
If food is your only problem, I will get you some other food to replace him. I will give you more food than you can ever imagine.
But please, let my brother go! I beg of you!”

The ghoul laughed aloud and said:
“How can I let go of this long awaited feast just because you promise me some other food in bargain?
Listen O prince!
There is no such price for redemption. I will not give him up.
I would be a fool if I let this food slip away from my hand. I am too hungry now to bargain with you. But you appear to be wiser than your brother.
However I shall tell you now a vow which I have taken. There are many questions deeply afflicting my mind. If you can answer them satisfactorily, I shall release your brother.”

Hemaangada was too glad to oblige. He requested the ghoul to present any question he desired fit and he would try his best to answer all his queries.
Here is how the conversation of the Brahmaraakshasa and Hemaangada went forth.

Brahmaraakshasa:
What is more extensive than space and more subtle than the subtlest?
What is its nature? Where does it abide?
Tell me, Prince.

Prince Hemaangada:
Listen o Ghoul!
Pure Consciousness (CHIT) is wider than space and subtler than the subtlest.
Its nature is to glow. It abides as the Self.

BR:
How can it be wider than space, being single?
How is it subtler than the subtlest? What is that glow?
And what is that Self?
Tell me, Prince.

PH:
Listen o Ghoul!
Being the material cause of all, Pure Consciousness is extensive though single.
It is beyond the grasp of the mind; so it is subtle.
Glowing obviously implies consciousness and that is the Self.

BR:
Where and how is this Chit (Principle of Knowledge) to be realized?
What is the effect?

PH:
Listen o Ghoul!
The intellectual sheath must be probed for its Realization.
One-pointed search for it reveals its existence.
Rebirth is overcome by such Realization.

BR:
What is that sheath?
What is concentration of mind?
Again what is birth?

PH:
Listen o Ghoul!
The intellectual sheath is the veil drawn over Pure Consciousness; it is inert by itself.
One-pointedness is abiding as the Self.
Birth is the false identification of the Self with the body.

BR:
Why is that Supreme Consciousness which is ever shining not realized?
What is the means by which it can be realized?
Why did birth take place at all?

PH:
Listen o Ghoul!
Ignorance is the cause of non-Realization.
Self realizes the Self; there is no external aid possible.
Birth originated through the sense of doer ship.

BR:
What is that ignorance of which you speak?
What is again the Self?
Whose is the sense of doer ship?



PH:
Listen o Ghoul!
Ignorance is the sense of separateness from Consciousness and false identification with the non-self (body).
As for the Self, the question must be referred to the Self in you.
The ego or the ‘I-thought’ is the root of action.

BR:
By what means is ignorance to be destroyed?
How is the means acquired?
What leads to such means?

PH:
Listen o Ghoul!
Rational enquiry cuts at the root of ignorance.
Dispassion develops rational enquiry.
Disgust of the pleasures of life generates dispassion towards them.

BR:
What is Enquiry?
What is dispassion?
What is disgust in pleasures?

PH:
Listen o Ghoul!
Enquiry is analysis conducted within oneself, discriminating the non-self from the Self, stimulated by a stern, strong and sincere desire to realize the Self.
Dispassion is non-attachment to surroundings.
Disgust in pleasures occurs if the misery resulting from attachment is understood by the mind.

BR:
What is the root cause of the whole series of these requirements?

PH:
Listen o Ghoul!
Divine Grace is the root cause of all that is good.
Devotion to God alone can bring down His Grace.
This devotion is produced and developed by the company of the wise.  

BR:
Who is that God?
What is devotion to Him?
Who are the wise?


PH:
Listen o Ghoul!
God is the Supreme Controller of the world.
Devotion is unwavering love for Him.
The wise are those who abide in Supreme state of the Self and melt with love for all.

BR:
Who is always in the grip of fear?
Who is always in the grip of misery?
Who is always in the grip of poverty?

PH:
Listen o Ghoul!
Fear holds a man possessed of enormous wealth.
Misery holds a man possessed of a large family.
Poverty holds a man possessed of insatiable desires.

BR:
Who is fearless?
Who is free from misery?
Who is never needy?

PH:
Listen o Ghoul!
The man with no attachments is free from fear.
The one with controlled mind is free from misery.
The Self-realized man is never needy.

BR:
Who is he who is beyond the men’s understanding and is visible though without a body?
What is the action of the inactive? (Who does not do anything though doing action?)

PH:
Listen o Ghoul!
The man liberated here and now is beyond the men’s understanding.
He is seen (as a body) though he does not identify himself with the body.
His actions are those of the inactive. (He does not do anything though doing actions)

BR:
What is real?
What is unreal?
What is inappropriate?
Answer these questions and redeem your brother.



PH:
Listen o Ghoul!
The subject (Self) is real.
The object (non-self) is unreal.
Worldly transactions are inappropriate.
I have now answered your questions. Please release my brother at once.”

When the Prince had finished the ghoul released Rukmaangada with pleasure.
Instantly a Brahmin of virtuous glow appeared in the place of the Brahmaraakshasa.
The two princes were amazed by the miraculous occurrence. They saluted the Brahmin and asked him who he was.

The Brahmin said:
“I was formerly a Brahmin of Magadha. My name is Vasumaan. I was famous for my learning and known as an invincible debater. I was very vain headed about my intellectual supremacy and always participated in the debates conducted in the assembly of those learned scholars who collected in my country under royal patronage.
There was amongst them a great saint, perfect in wisdom and entirely Self-possessed. He was known as Ashtaka. I went there for love of debate.
Though I was a mere logician, I argued against his statement on Self-Realization by sheer force of logic. He backed his arguments by profuse quotations from the Sacred Scriptures. Since I was too arrogant of my learning, I continued to refute him.
Finding me incorrigible, he remained silent.
However one of his disciples, a descendant of Kashyapa lineage, was enraged at my audacity and cursed me in front of the king, saying:
“You wretched Brahmin!
How dare you refute my Guru without first understanding his statements?
May you at once become a Brahma-Raakshasa and remain so for a long time.”

I was shocked and frightened by the curse and took refuge at the feet of the Sage Ashtaka. Being always in the state of the Self, the compassionate one took pity on me though I had arrogantly argued with him before.
He modified his disciple’s curse by pronouncing redemption to it as follows:
“May you resume your old shape as soon as a wise man gives the correct answers to all the questions which were raised here by you, answered by me but refuted by your polemics”.
O Prince!
You have now released me from that curse. I therefore consider you as the best among men, knowing all that pertains to life here and beyond.”

The princes were surprised by listening to the story of his life.
The Brahmin requested Hemaangada to clear some more of his doubts. Hemaangada obliged with extreme kindness and answered all his questions.
Here is how the conversation went forth.


Vasumaan:
Prince!
I shall ask you a question. Please answer me.
I learnt about the Supreme Truth from Ashtaka and later from you.
You are a Sage; but still, how is it that you go out hunting?
How can a Sage be engaged in work?
Work implies duality; wisdom is non-duality; the two are thus opposed to each other. Please clear this doubt of mine.

Hemaangada:
O Brahmin!
Your confusion owing to ignorance has not yet been cleared up.
Knowlede arising out of Self-realization is eternal and natural. How can it be contradicted by work?  If Knowledge is affected by work, then it will be worthless like a dream experience. No eternal good is possible in that case.
All actions performed exist on the support of Self-awareness or Knowledge.
Being so, can work destroy Knowledge and yet remain in its absence?
Knowledge is that Consciousness in which this world with all its phenomena and activities is known to exist as an image or series of images.
Duality essential for work is also a phenomenon in that ‘Non-dual Awareness’.
There is no doubt that a man realizes the Self only after purging himself of all thoughts and that he is then released from bondage once for all.
Your question has thus no basis and cannot be expected of the wise.

Vasumaan:
True, O Prince! I have also concluded that the Self is pure, unblemished Intelligence.
But how can it remain unblemished when a willful thought arises in it?
How can a realized person be untainted by his actions?
A coil of rope alone appears as a snake.
So also the thought is a modification of the Self alone.
So, is not the Pure Intelligence blemished by appearing as a thought?

Hemaangada:
Your question is wrong again.
You are not able to distinguish between confusion and clarity.
Sky appears blue, even though the space is colorless in truth.
A person who knows this truth and another who is ignorant of the truth, both see the sky only as blue. The sky appears blue to all alike whether they know that space is colorless or not. In this case, the one who is ignorant of the color-less space is ‘confused’. The one who knows the truth is ‘not confused’.
The wise man also sees the blueness of the sky but his apparent confusion is harmless like in the presence of a dead snake.
Similarly the Knower of the Self is untainted by his actions.
He remains as his Self always.

Just like the reflections do not taint a mirror, a knower is also unaffected by his apparent actions. There lies the difference between a Sage and an ignorant man.
The former has accurate knowledge and unerring judgment, whereas the latter has a blurred conception and his judgment is warped.

A Sage never is lost to the Knowledge of his Self, even though he may appear to be immersed in actions. All his activities are like reflections in a mirror for, being Self-realized, ignorance can no longer touch him.

Misconception due to sheer ignorance can be corrected by true knowledge.
But misconception due to some fault cannot be so easily corrected.
So long as there is myopia, the eyesight will be blurred and many images of a single object will be seen.
The body which has arisen out of some past action cannot vanish when one realizes the Self. The body and the world around it continue to get perceived by the knower though he knows their unreal nature.
So long as there is the Praarabdha (residual past karma) unaccounted for, the manifestation of the world will continue for the Knower, though only as an unreal phenomenon. It is like an arrow already shot from the bow and has to end only when its goal is reached.

The life-existence which is the result of a past Karma can only end at its death and the Knower continues to see this world as long as his body remains alive in this world.
This will also vanish as soon as the Praarabdha has played itself out and then pure, unblemished Intelligence alone will remain.

Therefore I tell you, there is no blemish attached to a Knower though he appears active and engaged in worldly duties.

Vasumaan:
O Prince! How can there be any residue of past karma in a Knower? Does not Jnaana burn away all actions like fire destroying a heap of camphor?

Hemaangada:
Listen Brahmin!
There are three kinds of Karma, as you already know.
Praarabdha- Actions of the past which have begun to take fruit;
Agaami Karma- the results of the present actions which are yet to bear fruit;
Sanchita Karma- the results of the actions of innumerable births of the past which still not have begun to bear fruit.
The first of these alone remains for the Knower and the other two are burnt away.
When a person realizes the Self, both the Agaami and Sanchita Karma fruits get annihilated; but the Praarabdha alone remains.
Since it has already begun to yield fruit, it continues its course even for the Knower.


Karma matures in course of time. This is the ordained law of the Creator. When mature, it is bound to yield its fruits.
But the Karma of the Knower is rendered ineffective because of Self-Knowledge.

Karma already in the maturing state and yielding results is called Prarabdha: it is like an arrow already shot from a bow which must run its course until its momentum is lost.
Perception of the world is apparently similar to one and all.
Praarabdha of a person results in creating a particular environment for him.
Knowers view the world around them differently according to their own levels of Realization.

Pleasure and pain are cognized by the ‘least among the Sages’, but do not leave any mark on them as in the ignorant. These Knowers act equanimous to both pain and pleasure. They still have the sense of what is pleasure and what is pain.

Pleasure and pain operate on the middle class of Sages in the same way; however, they react only indistinctly to their surroundings, as a man in sleep does to a gentle breeze or to an insect creeping over him. They do not bother about either of them.
They find no meaning in either of them. They too have a very vague sense of what is pleasure and what is pain.

Pleasure and pain are experienced by the highest among the Sages; yet they look upon them as unreal phenomenon equaling a hare’s horn. For them, pleasure and pain are not indistinct experiences. Nothing bothers them.

The ignorant always experience pains and pleasures as real. They always make efforts to gain pleasures and avoid pains. After every experience they remember the measure of pain or pleasure in every event; reflect over them always; and are left with a strong impression on their minds.
The ignorant are not aware of the pure Self; they see it always blemished (as the body).  They believe in the reality of objective world and are therefore affected by the pleasures and pains of life.

The lowest order of Knowers experience the Self-state intermittently (only when contemplating); and spells of ignorance overtake them whenever overcome by their Vaasanaas.
They look upon the body as the SELF and the world as real.
They sometimes conquer the Vaasanaas with effort. But there is always a struggle between Knowledge and ignorance - each of them prevailing alternatively.

The Knower tries his best to attain the Knowledge of the Self and fights the ignorance until it is thoroughly destroyed, and Self alone remains as his true state.
In that state of Self-Knowledge there are no differentiations.

Forgetfulness of the Self never overtakes a middle class Knower and wrong knowledge never possesses him. However he of his own accord brings out some Vaasanaas from his own mind in order to maintain his body according to Praarabdha.
This is the conduct of a Knower who has attained the Self state through sincere practice.

As for the aspirant, there is no forgetfulness of the Self so long as he is engaged in practicing contemplation.
But the accomplished Knower never is lost to the Knowledge of the Self and picks out his own Vaasanaas according to his own choice.
The highest Knower makes no difference between Samaadhi and worldly transactions. He never finds anything apart from the Self and so differentiations do not exist for him.

The middle order Knower is fond of contemplative state of Samaadhi and voluntarily seeks it. He may feel affected by the world a little when he is engaged in worldly affairs, or even in the maintenance of his body.

On the other hand, the Knower of the highest order is always in the Self-state even when dealing with the worldly affairs and he is never affected by anything.

The Knower of the middle order and of the highest order have no tinge of Karma left in them because they are in the Self-state and do not perceive anything apart from the Self.
How can there be anything of Karma left when the wild fire of Knowledge burns away all the faults of ignorance?  

Knower has the root of misery cut off at the instant of realizing the Self. It is immaterial for him if he dies in sacred place or in tainted surroundings; remains conscious or unconscious before death. He is liberated always.

If one realizes Shiva, the Self of all even once as guided by his Guru, or by scriptural statements or by enquiry, there could no longer remain any tinge of obligatory duty on his part because he is liberated for ever.

His actions appear to be real only for the ignorant onlooker.
I shall explain this point further.
The state of the Knower is said to be identical with that of Shiva.
There is not the least difference between them.
Therefore Karma cannot taint a Knower.”

Vasumaan had all his doubts cleared by this discourse of Hemaangada. He had a clear understanding of true Realization.
Vasumaan and the prince saluted each other and returned to their respective places.


END


No comments:

Post a Comment